Copy Transform Cumulative?
3527 5 0- mschmeling
- Member
- 7 posts
- Joined: Aug. 2009
- Offline
- tamte
- Member
- 8444 posts
- Joined: July 2007
- Offline
I don't think it's a bug as having cumulative off required using local variables which are purposely avoided, so you can still use Copy Stamp if you need that
or do similar thing in for loop
you can maybe submit a RFE for a mode where the transform will be linearly interpolated up to the transform value or something like that, to bring back some of such functionality without using local variables
or do similar thing in for loop
you can maybe submit a RFE for a mode where the transform will be linearly interpolated up to the transform value or something like that, to bring back some of such functionality without using local variables
Tomas Slancik
FX Supervisor
Method Studios, NY
FX Supervisor
Method Studios, NY
- jsmack
- Member
- 7658 posts
- Joined: Sept. 2011
- Online
- tamte
- Member
- 8444 posts
- Joined: July 2007
- Offline
jsmackthat's kind of the issue, that there is no way to turn it off, like when you want your scales to be just linearly increasing instead of exponentially
Transform cumulative is always on now
I think internal linear interpolation would be great, like setting 360 in rotation would linearly distribute the copies so you don't have to compute the angle yourself, etc, simply what was common before with transform cumulative off and using local variables
similarly setting scale to 10 would linearly increase scale from 1 to 10 etc
Edited by tamte - May 18, 2017 01:08:11
Tomas Slancik
FX Supervisor
Method Studios, NY
FX Supervisor
Method Studios, NY
- BabaJ
- Member
- 2024 posts
- Joined: Sept. 2015
- Offline
- mschmeling
- Member
- 7 posts
- Joined: Aug. 2009
- Offline
-
- Quick Links