Search - User list
Full Version: Mantra vs AMD Threadripper 2990wx
Root » Houdini Lounge » Mantra vs AMD Threadripper 2990wx
Hideki Suzuki
On Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS, 2990wx(no overclocking).

Mantra - 32 core, SMT on - 1.23 min.

====================================================
Houdini FX Version 17.0.459

Operating System: Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS
Number of Cores: 64
Physical Memory: 62.83 GB
Number of Screens: 1
Screen 0: 3440 x 1440 at 0,0
Work Area 0: 3373 x 1413 at 67,27

Build platform: linux-x86_64-gcc6.3
Qt Version: 5.6.1

OpenGL Vendor: NVIDIA Corporation
OpenGL Renderer: GeForce GTX 1080/PCIe/SSE2
OpenGL Version: 4.6.0 NVIDIA 415.27
OpenGL Shading Language: 4.60 NVIDIA
Detected: NVidia Consumer
8192 MB
415.27.0.0
Mjag007
This thread is interesting,

After posting that Im looking for an updated system
I decided to try both scenes on my current system.
Which is sort of an old system and the numbers really surprised me.

Mantra 1:49
Arnold 2:25

Win 10
Dual 2683 v3 12 core
64 gig mem
1080 8 gig
tardigrad3
Mjag007
This thread is interesting,

After posting that Im looking for an updated system
I decided to try both scenes on my current system.
Which is sort of an old system and the numbers really surprised me.

Mantra 1:49
Arnold 2:25

Win 10
Dual 2683 v3 12 core
64 gig mem
1080 8 gig

well, thats interesting. Can you please link here the two final renders?
Charles Kirk
Mjag007
This thread is interesting,

After posting that Im looking for an updated system
I decided to try both scenes on my current system.
Which is sort of an old system and the numbers really surprised me.

Mantra 1:49
Arnold 2:25

Win 10
Dual 2683 v3 12 core
64 gig mem
1080 8 gig

According to the Intel Ark your CPUs have 14 cores each for a total of 28.
https://ark.intel.com/content/www/us/en/ark/products/81055/intel-xeon-processor-e5-2683-v3-35m-cache-2-00-ghz.html [ark.intel.com]

Are you sure you have quoted the correct specification for your workstation?
Mjag007
@tardigrad3 I will post the renders asap.

Ahh Yes, Penboack you are correct I thought the right information was typed.
Mjag007
Images
Sergen Eren
Hi,

very interesting results in this topic. I'm also waiting for threadripper gen 3 to update my pc and will be on windows platform. I'm sure things will get better by that time but wonder if you had time to check coreprio (https://bitsum.com/portfolio/coreprio/)

maybe it can improve your render times
jarenas
Heileif
cpb
I'm getting 1m44s in Linux, with an older 16-core 1950x, no OC.
What is your ram speed?

I got 2m 10s on my 1950x stock.

ram is 64Gb running 2400mhz, i know these cpus can get allot of boost with faster ram.

Your 1950X is using Linux or Windows? I'm trying to quantify rendering performance differences between both . I have seen about +20% performance difference in favour of Linux in my first (admittedly superficial) tests, and that's a great difference to take into account for specific projects.
pbowmar
Yes, Linux will perform roughly 15% faster than Windows, sometimes more depending on how much bloat is running on the Windows machine. You can tune Windows to be faster by turning a lot of stuff off though, but Linux always gives you a faster render using identical hardware.

I'm not saying which is better, just objectively observing an existing situation. No OS war implied!

Cheers,

Peter B
anon_user_40689665
pbowmar
You can tune Windows to be faster by turning a lot of stuff off though
This is pretty important. I've seen machines so crippled by middleware that it takes 2~5min to open a hipfile that would open instantly at home, on much slower hardware. Problem is worse with Windows10 as it doesn't do a clean install by default.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Powered by DjangoBB