For each loop VS for each subnetwork.

   3162   2   0
User Avatar
Member
118 posts
Joined: 2月 2016
オフライン
I'm kind of confused, any reason to use one over the other?

When performing same tasks, I feel like the for-each-subnetwork has slower cooking times (especially when copy-stamping) and it's harder to properly setup, but I might missing some advantages or unique features over the for-each-loop.

What do you think?
User Avatar
Member
2658 posts
Joined: 6月 2008
オフライン
The for-each subnet is the previous attempt by SideFX to include a looping feature. The new for-each is the current loops version. You can surround a for-each with a compile loop to regain some speed lost due to looping.
Edited by Enivob - 2017年7月9日 11:15:45
Using Houdini Indie 20.5
Windows 11 64GB Ryzen 16 core.
nVidia 3060RTX 12BG RAM.
User Avatar
Member
118 posts
Joined: 2月 2016
オフライン
Hello, thanks for clarifying!
I can forget about the for-each subnetwork then, and will investigate the compiled loop options (-:

Cheers
  • Quick Links