Martin Matzeder

tamte

sanostol
Simple example would be a reparenting graph, that would need the current restlocal and multiplying it by the inverted parent matrix
this works but right now the additional nodes are stored in the updated graph

That sounds like the regular component graph, which is a graph that alters the incoming rig graph, therefore it can alter rest matrix on the node without adding nodes that do that into the rig graph
Or add/reparent nodes if thats what you desire

Thank You Tomas,

so like the 20.5 way.
I was just wondering it it would be possible with the new fusegraph workflow as well.
thank You
Martin

Umang_Raj
sorry but, i couldn't understand your question, im guessing that by value nodes you mean node names which you use to find and fetch output for a tobject node, and then you set restlocal using the component namespace node, if you can do that, then you must be able to add anything in between on the matrix

Hi, I followed a new tutorial by sidefx, I think it is by Max Rose, where he shows the fusegraph workflow. There he uses a value<Matrix4> Node to grab the restlocal of a existing node. If You plug it in a TranformObject Node as restlocal it is stored directly there. in the fusedGraph the value<Matrix4> is not added to the graph, but instead the values are stored in the new transform object.

if You blend two of the value nodes the blend is added to the resulting graph

I was simply wondering if I can store the result of the blend the same way in the TransformObject

Maybe screenshots make it more clear:
The fuse graph for simle value<matrix4>

and the result:



the fuse graph with a blended transform:

and the result:



i hope this makes my point more clear
thank You
Martin

the configureControls allows me to completle block one axis, that is great, but it does not prevent keying this axis. is there a way to define what channels are keyable? it would be great to not store that keys

it would be great if the configure controls would be able to set this keyabilty as well