Trying to use the Vulkan viewport for transparency mapped hair cards is still unusable and unacceptable. The edges are not sharp but a pixelated mess even on high quality. There are still depth sorting and lighting issues. I don't know why SideFX has deemed this production ready, but it isn't for game dev.

Please tell me I'm missing some setting or something. I guess back to OpenGL again.

Edit: Well, OpenGL looks like it has all kinds of issues. Lights don't work at all. Wireframes don't show.

Vulkan viewport has to be the most disappointing update of Houdini. It's so bad. I really don't know how they have the audacity to make it the default option. Now Vulkan is pre-beta (at best) and OpenGL is getting depreciated. H21 is a DCC with a history of 30 years but with no production-ready viewport.

Until some form of order-independent transparency or alpha hashing is implemented, it looks like cutout is the only usable option in situations with overlapping transparent geometry. It seems like it uses any alpha value > 0 as 1, so adding a power after the alpha image in the material will allow you to control the alpha cutoff amount. I guess that will have to do for now, but hopefully this gets some attention in the future.

Cutout transparency works well because that case is the one cutout was designed to solve. There are 4 transparency modes in the viewport -- None (ignore alpha entirely), Cutout (pass/fail depending on alpha value), Low (topmost face only), and Medium & High (Order independent transparency, 4 or 8 layers). Because of amount layering involved with those cards, even Medium/High transparency doesn't produce great results (transparency is a bit of a problem for rasterizers). Also, when Work Lights are active, the viewport is limited to Low quality transparency to maximize performance. If you add a light to the scene, you'll be able to compare Cutout, Low, and Medium. IMO, cutout definitely produces the best result, though Medium/High is a bit better than Low.

It'd be useful to add a parameter to the Visualize Properties SOP to force Cutout transparency. We have something similar for Sprites but it's not generalized to all material rendering. A full ray tracing pipeline would also produce better results, but that's a ways off.

Please, is transparency (vs @Alpha) being worked on?
Is there any estimate of when we could achieve better results in Vulkan?

Best regards, J.

Thank you for all the work you do to improve the Vulkan viewport! It is better and better each week.

Please as regards those Medium & High transparency, 4 or 8 layers. Can we have a setting to increase those to maybe 32, 64, or more?

Best regards, J.

The Med/High transparency uses a z-sorted-sample technique that uses the MSAA feature of GPUs to render different depths to the samples instead of doing AA. Unfortunately GPUs are only capable of a maximum of 8 sample multisample buffers, so 8 samples is the max for this approach. Higher AA modes are done by making the framebuffer larger by 2 or 4x and consolidating samples from multiple pixels into the final pixel. While this approach works for AA, it doesn't for the OIT approach we're using (the GL high-quality transparency, which uses 16x AA, has some artifacts because of this). We'll need a different approach to do highly layered transparency.