Hi,
I want to buy a new graphic card. I dont have money for a professionnal series so I 'm interesting to your experience with gamer card.
-Ati had a bad drivers reputation, but in opencl their card are faster than nvidia equivalent.
- Nvidia have a good driver but in professionnel context their gaming card are restricted (to sell their professionnal card ?… )
So i would like to have a feedback to ati user (artefact, crash, etc …)
Opencl1.1 Benchmark [clbenchmark.com]
if some users with a quadro card can do the benchmark for comparaison.
Thank have fun
Thomas
Ati vs nvidia
4515 4 0-
- papi
- Member
- 37 posts
- Joined: Sept. 2010
- Offline
-
- malexander
- Staff
- 5285 posts
- Joined: July 2005
- Offline
-
- papi
- Member
- 37 posts
- Joined: Sept. 2010
- Offline
-
- sami.tawil
- Member
- 172 posts
- Joined: March 2012
- Offline
-
- papi
- Member
- 37 posts
- Joined: Sept. 2010
- Offline
On my “old” gtx 470 with 12,800 millions (sphere polygon frequency 800)
aa 16x, smooth lines , hdr rendering, diffuse and specu
viewport report :
H11 = 1.1 fpm , 0.02 fps
Opengl 1 = 2.3 fps
Opengl 2.1 = 23 fps
Opengl 3.2 = 19 fps
really nice improvement from H11 ! but if i want to select a bunch of point houdini freeze with only one cpu thread at 100%.
Same for selection / deselection of a node seems to not multithread, houdini have a little lag (2/3s)
aa 16x, smooth lines , hdr rendering, diffuse and specu
viewport report :
H11 = 1.1 fpm , 0.02 fps
Opengl 1 = 2.3 fps
Opengl 2.1 = 23 fps
Opengl 3.2 = 19 fps
really nice improvement from H11 ! but if i want to select a bunch of point houdini freeze with only one cpu thread at 100%.
Same for selection / deselection of a node seems to not multithread, houdini have a little lag (2/3s)
-
- Quick Links


