Antoine Lecaille

I can't get the exact setup to do this:

subnet1 -> some process on a geometry, with no actual geometry inside the subnet, say one subdivide

geo1 -> the actual geometry to process with subnet1

attribute From Parameters for each of those nodes; possibly wired as inputs instead of being referenced in node path, but I believe `opinputpath(".",0)` can take care of this

Then I need to feed wire the two attributeFromParameters to Invoke Compiled Graph
I keep on reading the doc for this node, and it should work in theory, but I can't get a working setup to have a clean separation between process (subnet1) and data (geo1)

My goal is to do something on the graph representation of subnet1 when it's just text after, attribute From Parameters. For example, I would go through some specific values of known verbs and tweak them in a loop.

I can confirm this is happening.
But the place to do it is:
https://www.sidefx.com/bugs/submit/ [www.sidefx.com]
Basically submit your message there, you already have the screen capture and the bug description, it should take 1 minute.

Sadly no. Not right now. The font SOP is truly outdated, and has been for years.


However, this is trivial to create a subnetwork that has an additional integer parameter, that holds a hardcoded list of the font files, and have a font detail attribute somewhere which the Font SOP can refer to using: details(...,"font")
I tested it with the actual font files (full path on the filesystem), and it's working.
And you can tie the font detail to a given element of the font list with a integer parameter.

in a detail wrangle

s@font=s@fontList;


Finally, this subnet could be saved as a Digital Asset, and be integrated into your operators. I can't tell you much more than that, but that's a way to do it,