POP Mass is inverted or something?

   3731   5   1
User Avatar
Member
28 posts
Joined: Sept. 2018
Offline
Hi!

I want to control the mass of my POP particles, so that they fall slow or fast. For this I added a popforce instead of the gravity, since the popforce has this tick for “ignore mass”.

I'm assigning the mass attribute with a popwrangle, and it does react to it - however, if I have really low mass, like 0.1, the particles fall superfast. If I increase the mass to 1000, the particles barley fall at all. I was kind of expecting the opposite.

Anyone know why this is happening? Am I doing something wrong?
Image Not Found
User Avatar
Member
28 posts
Joined: Sept. 2018
Offline
And here's the hip file: https://www.dropbox.com/s/oinbjxss8pxcvz9/POP_Mass.hipnc?dl=0 [www.dropbox.com]
User Avatar
Member
8177 posts
Joined: Sept. 2011
Offline
Sounds correct to me.

Remember, Force = Mass * Acceleration

A force will result in 1/2 as much acceleration for a body with 2 times the mass.

A gravity force applies an acceleration directly, the force is proportional to mass, resulting in all bodies gaining the same acceleration.
User Avatar
Member
28 posts
Joined: Sept. 2018
Offline
Great, thanks for feedback!

Hmm that was very confusing so I had to go in the thinking box for a while, but I think I got it!
Force = Mass * Acceleration is indeed correct, but since the solver calculates acceleration, based on the force, it made more sense to flip the equation, hence, Acceleration = force/Mass.

So yeah, bigger mass, means slower acceleration.

First this did not make sense to me, since I was imagining two volumes in air, where both volumes were the same size, but had different mass. In my head, the volume with the largest mass would fall faster due to air resistance.

But when I imagine the same volumes in vacuum, they accelerate at the exact same speed - which tells me that it would not make sense to see any difference in acceleration at all, when adjusting the mass. Which just made everything even more confusing.

But! If I imagine a tiny jet motor on each volumes in space, it makes sense that the volume with the largest mass accelerates much slower than than the other. So this leads me to the conclusion that it never made sense to use a POP force to simulate gravity. The POP force could instead be used for things like wind or propulsion. If I want this to act the way I wanted it to, I should probably delete the POP force, add the original gravity force back, add a drag force, and adjust the air resistance instead?

Please correct me if my reasoning is wrong
User Avatar
Member
166 posts
Joined: Feb. 2014
Offline
Or you could multiply your force by the mass. That way heavier objects will drop faster.

Attachments:
POP_Mass 2.hipnc (318.7 KB)

http://simonfarussell.com [simonfarussell.com]
User Avatar
Member
28 posts
Joined: Sept. 2018
Offline
Thank's that's a good tip!
  • Quick Links