redhat/rhel/centos 7 stability?

   11414   13   2
User Avatar
Member
69 posts
Joined: April 2013
Offline
how is houdini 13 running on redhat/rhel/centos 7? is it pretty stable?
User Avatar
Member
443 posts
Joined: Sept. 2012
Offline
Yeah.
User Avatar
Member
69 posts
Joined: April 2013
Offline
i've noticed that centos 7 gets real clunky when under load (simming, compiling, etc)

sometimes the UI freezes for 3 seconds. video that i'm streaming is choppy.centos 6 wasn't bad like this. i haven't tested it as extensively, but ubunutu had similar issues.

anyone else having this issue in centos 7 or ubuntu?
User Avatar
Member
333 posts
Joined: Oct. 2012
Offline
im very sad about centOS 7. To me they went the wrong direction, but this is another discussion. I would stay with 6.5 or get another distro. But dunno which one.

I'm really happy with CentOS 6 and Houdini, runs great on it. very stable!
User Avatar
Member
69 posts
Joined: April 2013
Offline
the only reason why i'm using centos 7 and not staying with 6 is because of google chrome.
User Avatar
Member
260 posts
Joined: July 2006
Offline
happy with fedora 20 and mint also
Head of CG @ MPC
CG Supervisor/ Sr. FX TD /
https://gumroad.com/timvfx [gumroad.com]
www.timucinozger.com
User Avatar
Member
1391 posts
Joined: Dec. 2010
Offline
It's working perfectly on Ubuntu and Mint too 8)
https://www.youtube.com/c/sadjadrabiee [www.youtube.com]
Rabiee.Sadjad@Gmail.Com
User Avatar
Member
69 posts
Joined: April 2013
Offline
great to hear about houdini running well, but how is your experience with the operating system while you are running houdini sims?

have you guys experienced the OS slowdowns i've described?
User Avatar
Member
260 posts
Joined: July 2006
Offline
Forgot to mention also on centos 6 for 1.5 years and no problems.

Maybe freezes got something to do with all these GUI olverlays and pretty GUI stuff, I never had any of these problems on Ubuntu , but on Fedora I am on Mate, which I beleive makes Houdini run more smooth in my experience.

The only reason I can think of any OS to slow down during simming is because you must be simply running out of ram. I don`t think there is any other reason to this, I am actually pretty sure that thats the reason.

H13 came with a new memory allocation tool,this new memory allocation thingy would make use of all your ram after a while running your simulation. It was told that ``it was fragmenting the memory but it is not a memory leak``.
Meaning task manager may tell you that you are using all of your ram after a while you ran a flip simulation, which should not fill up your ram. But the computer would keep responding unlike when the OS uses swap due to not enough memory, which makes a pc unusable.

This issue have been fixed long time ago as I don`t experience it at my workstation anymore.

I hope I managed to answer your question
Head of CG @ MPC
CG Supervisor/ Sr. FX TD /
https://gumroad.com/timvfx [gumroad.com]
www.timucinozger.com
User Avatar
Member
4189 posts
Joined: June 2012
Offline
tricecold
H13 came with a new memory allocation tool,this new memory allocation thingy would make use of all your ram after a while running your simulation. It was told that ``it was fragmenting the memory but it is not a memory leak``.


This only affected Windows. The memory allocator in Linux is jemalloc.

http://www.canonware.com/jemalloc/ [canonware.com]
User Avatar
Member
1391 posts
Joined: Dec. 2010
Offline
stkeg
great to hear about houdini running well, but how is your experience with the operating system while you are running houdini sims?

have you guys experienced the OS slowdowns i've described?

I tested simulation on Mint and Windows7 , In my experience , Linux use less RAM , for example I made a simple Flip Simulation , Memory Usage on linux was 6 GB , But on the Win7 was 9 GB.

Of course this is should be different on different projects and setup.
Also I think allocation memory on Windows 8 is better and use different method versus Windows 7.

Also I used a SSD drive with EX4 format for caching simulation on the Disk.
And I used another SSD drive with ntfs format too.
Saving and Reading time for large cache files from EX4 partition was 1.5 ~ 2 times faster that ntfs ! :wink:

I didn't test on Mac ,But I think because of same care structure for Mac and Linux , they are should be same for this tests .:?
https://www.youtube.com/c/sadjadrabiee [www.youtube.com]
Rabiee.Sadjad@Gmail.Com
User Avatar
Member
260 posts
Joined: July 2006
Offline
Should have mentioned that, you are right, thanks for correcting


MartybNz
tricecold
H13 came with a new memory allocation tool,this new memory allocation thingy would make use of all your ram after a while running your simulation. It was told that ``it was fragmenting the memory but it is not a memory leak``.


This only affected Windows. The memory allocator in Linux is jemalloc.

http://www.canonware.com/jemalloc/ [canonware.com]
Head of CG @ MPC
CG Supervisor/ Sr. FX TD /
https://gumroad.com/timvfx [gumroad.com]
www.timucinozger.com
User Avatar
Member
17 posts
Joined: Nov. 2013
Offline
anybody tried MANJARO? yet
User Avatar
Member
279 posts
Joined: Dec. 2009
Offline
Mohammed Issa
anybody tried MANJARO? yet
I'm using it since 2 years now and all is fine. A very good distro.
  • Quick Links