First of all I would like to thank you the developer to the effort they did to this new version (15.5) of the bevel that already brings a lot and which I hope is still evolving.
So, I would like to suggest some improvements to the new bevel SOP.
But before make an RFE I would like to know your opinion about these.
1) Hard edges option with automatic edge selection controls
I don't how quickly make some specifics edges as “hard edge” in houdini but in Sofimage, we have an option “Mark HardEdge/Vertex” which adapts the normal of an object.
And to get back to the bevel, we have in Soft this option included with automatic edge selection controls.
As It seem I can only add one attachement by post (Or I forgot something somewhere), I will make multiples messages.
Bevel Suggestion
8469 18 0
-
- julca
- Member
- 241 posts
- Joined: Oct. 2015
- Offline
-
- julca
- Member
- 241 posts
- Joined: Oct. 2015
- Offline
-
- julca
- Member
- 241 posts
- Joined: Oct. 2015
- Offline
-
- julca
- Member
- 241 posts
- Joined: Oct. 2015
- Offline
-
- julca
- Member
- 241 posts
- Joined: Oct. 2015
- Offline
-
- julca
- Member
- 241 posts
- Joined: Oct. 2015
- Offline
-
- julca
- Member
- 241 posts
- Joined: Oct. 2015
- Offline
4) Add a quick amount extrapolation
A sort of “profile scale” option that we have with the “Profile” Shape option, but directly with the “Round” Shape option :
More straightforward and without the need to shape a profile curve.
On the new version of Maya, there are also a lot improvements on the bevel, perhaps some good ideas to take.
http://area.autodesk.com/blogs/the-maya-blog/maya-2016-extension-2-technical-modeling-improvements [area.autodesk.com]
If there is a motivated maya guy around, he could probably add other supplement suggestions (That would be cool
).
A sort of “profile scale” option that we have with the “Profile” Shape option, but directly with the “Round” Shape option :
More straightforward and without the need to shape a profile curve.
On the new version of Maya, there are also a lot improvements on the bevel, perhaps some good ideas to take.
http://area.autodesk.com/blogs/the-maya-blog/maya-2016-extension-2-technical-modeling-improvements [area.autodesk.com]
If there is a motivated maya guy around, he could probably add other supplement suggestions (That would be cool
).
-
- NNois
- Member
- 174 posts
- Joined: March 2014
- Offline
-
- anon_user_89151269
- Member
- 1755 posts
- Joined: March 2014
- Offline
-
- julca
- Member
- 241 posts
- Joined: Oct. 2015
- Offline
NNoisHappy that you're agree with this suggestions. On my side I use it really often (I mean bevel with this options) !
@julca you're right, the new bevel tool IMO would be in a better state with at least #2 & #3, that's two mandatory features to work correctly…
One more suggestion on which I restrained myself to to talk about and change my mind as I just use it today and realise that's yes it's a needed feature
!5) Add a center offset (gif attachment just talk himself)
-
- julca
- Member
- 241 posts
- Joined: Oct. 2015
- Offline
-
- old_school
- Staff
- 2540 posts
- Joined: July 2005
- Offline
julca
1) Hard edges option with automatic edge selection controls
I don't how quickly make some specifics edges as “hard edge” in houdini but in Sofimage, we have an option “Mark HardEdge/Vertex” which adapts the normal of an object.
And to get back to the bevel, we have in Soft this option included with automatic edge selection controls.
I don't know if we have a direct vertex normal cusp. Please submit an RFE for this.
But this technique does work where you select edges, do an Edge Cusp SOP, then follow blindly with Normal SOP then Fuse SOP.
Edited by old_school - May 30, 2016 17:32:29
There's at least one school like the old school!
-
- julca
- Member
- 241 posts
- Joined: Oct. 2015
- Offline
jeffThanks for the tip jeff ! It's not the most simplest way (as it is a bit “destructive” : disconnect/reconnect edges just to adjust normal vertex) but it can do the job.
I don't know if we have a direct vertex normal cusp. Please submit an RFE for this.
But this technique does work where you select edges, do an Edge Cusp SOP, then follow blindly with Normal SOP then Fuse SOP.
I'll post an RFE.
-
- julca
- Member
- 241 posts
- Joined: Oct. 2015
- Offline
-
- Werner Ziemerink
- Member
- 1268 posts
- Joined: March 2014
- Offline
-
- julca
- Member
- 241 posts
- Joined: Oct. 2015
- Offline
Werner ZiemerinkYes and thank you for the demo, it can be done on profile side but you need to reshape profile curve point one by one (set position and nature of curve) before you can play with the “profile scale” param to achieve what you want.
#4 can easily be achieved by using profile to flip bevels.
But here I ask for a more straightforward method with the “round” shape option for all the major's simplest and recurrent cases :
That's resume in “just” expose a sort of “profile scale” to this “round” shape option without the need to manually shape a profile curve.
-
- anon_user_89151269
- Member
- 1755 posts
- Joined: March 2014
- Offline
I'd argue that this feature is used seldom enough (please correct me if it's not the case for you, I'm talking from my experience here) so that a curve profile will do. This profile, is after all, a feature that's not found in XSI (ignored be the scripting/ICE part) hence a bonus.
We have to pick and choose our battles and this one, in my humble opinion is not one we have to wage.
We have to pick and choose our battles and this one, in my humble opinion is not one we have to wage.
-
- julca
- Member
- 241 posts
- Joined: Oct. 2015
- Offline
McNistorWell, as it's a “bevel” thread, I'll just argue my point of view to be as clear as possible, no more.
We have to pick and choose our battles and this one, in my humble opinion is not one we have to wage.
And of course, this point (#4) it's far from the top of my/our request's list and the actual profile is, you're right, a really good bonus !
See you on another RFE
!Friendly.
-
- Quick Links